Peer Review Process

• Peer Review Process

  All manuscripts submitted to Nanar Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences undergo a rigorous peer review process. The purpose of peer review is to assist the Editorial Board in making informed editorial decisions and to support authors in improving the quality of their manuscripts.

  The journal applies a double-blind peer review system, in which the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other throughout the review process.

  Reviewers are selected at the discretion of the editors based on their expertise in the subject area of the submitted manuscript. Reviewers must have no conflict of interest, must not be affiliated with the same institution as the authors, and must not have recent joint publications with any of the authors.

  Each manuscript is reviewed independently by at least two qualified reviewers, who remain unaware of each other’s identities. In cases where reviewer recommendations differ significantly, the editor may appoint additional reviewers to reach a fair and well-informed decision.

  During the review process, the editor may request authors to provide additional information or supporting materials (including raw data) when necessary to assess the scholarly merit of the manuscript. All such materials are treated as confidential and must not be used for personal or professional advantage.

  The editorial team is responsible for maintaining the quality and integrity of the peer review process. If the objectivity or academic quality of a review is questioned, additional reviewers may be assigned to ensure fairness and scholarly rigor.